Skip to content

Consensus you can defend, round by round.

Delphi-style structured consensus: iterative rounds, independent input before group visibility, quantified agreement.

Book a demoSame platform, same guarantee. Only the scenario changes.
The problem

Why consensus exercises get challenged

  • In a live consensus meeting, the senior voice anchors the room - what emerges is convergence on hierarchy, not evidence.
  • Hand-run Delphi rounds by email are slow, leaky and painful to administer - so rounds get cut and rigour goes with them.
  • Without independent input before group visibility, you can’t show the consensus wasn’t manufactured.
How Rumi runs it

One platform. This scenario.

  1. Independent first rounds

    Participants respond to statements independently before seeing the group - the anchoring effect designed out.

  2. Iterative, quantified rounds

    Polls and rating scales quantify agreement each round; discussion refines the statements between rounds.

  3. A round-by-round record

    Every round’s inputs, changes and rationale captured - the methodology is visible in the record itself.

Why Rumi wins here

A natural Delphi engine

Rumi’s moderated, asynchronous format is built for exactly this - bias reduction is the whole point.

Full-panel rounds, guaranteed

Delphi rigour collapses when panellists skip rounds. The participation guarantee holds every round to the full panel.

Methodological credibility

Independent input, quantified agreement, auditable rounds - a consensus your publication and your critics can examine.

In production with global pharma
AstraZenecaBayerPharmingAmgenNovartisRecordati Rare DiseasesSobiMenarini
The guarantee travels

100% participation is as binding here as on an advisory board.

Same monitoring, same moderator tools, same written terms: a defined panel, a defined bar for participation, and a remedy if we miss.

Consensus & guideline development: your questions

Can Rumi run a Delphi panel?

Yes - Rumi’s format maps directly onto Delphi methodology: independent input before group visibility, iterative rounds with quantified agreement via polls and rating scales, moderated refinement between rounds, and a complete round-by-round record.

How many rounds can a consensus exercise run on Rumi?

As many as the methodology needs - rounds are structured windows in the same room, so additional rounds don’t multiply admin. Participation monitoring and moderator follow-up keep the full panel responding round after round, which is where hand-run Delphi exercises usually degrade.

See every voice heard, in full, on your own use case.

Book a demo
Thirty minutes with Steve Royle, founder, on your use case.